![]() ![]() |
Quarter Grand PosterGroup: Members
Joined: 4-November 03
Posts: 341
From: Long Island NY
|
Oct 12 2004, 10:51 PM |
|
|
anyone else noticing all these companies that are buying expired domains and putting up search portals?
so today I went to one site that I visit once a month or so, please excuse the profanity in the domain name, Used to be funny pictures here (sorry if mods have to delete this) anyway so the site is gone and replaced by a search portal (guess they forgot to renew, or just let it expire on their own). The links all have some sort of reference to apps5.oingo.com, and the page is a frameset with the main frame loading from http://apps5.oingo.com/apps/domainpark/dom...s=funnyshit.com so I went to http://www.oingo.com and found that it's an applied semantics site, just one page, and all links go to google.com... now it's late and I have a huge headache, and haven't done any more reading than what I've shown here, so can anyone fill me in on what I'm missing here... why does it appear that google is buying up expired domains and turning them into rather ugly search portals? Wouldn't google be the first one to penalize you for buying up an expired domain and turning it into whatever suits your fancy, just to try and benefit from the PR? this may belong in the google section so perhaps a mod can move it there if they want.. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Moderator![]() Group: Moderators
Joined: 6-March 03
Posts: 7,962
From: Langley, British Columbia, Canada
|
Oct 13 2004, 04:18 AM |
|
|
You can understand most of what is happening in a Google Press Release on the Applied Semantics Acquisition. Its CIRCA technology was regarded as a major body of work on contextual searching. They were the company that invented Adsense, since adopted by Google. Another article explains the oingo bit:
QUOTE Search engine upstart Google Wednesday said it has acquired Applied Semantics (formerly known as Oingo) for an undisclosed amount. Now who is handling all this domain name redirection: there's still the mystery. :? |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Moderator Alumni![]() Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 31-August 02
Posts: 15,634
|
Oct 13 2004, 06:06 AM |
|
|
Google isn't buying those domain names, but they are selling ads on them:
Google AdSense for domains I'm not sure when they started doing this. a snippet: QUOTE AdSense for domains allows domain name registrars and large domain name holders to unlock the value in their parked page inventory. There is a pretty big market in domain names, and they've probably become more of a commodity than anyone envisioned they would be. But the practice has been going on for years. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
UntestedGroup: Members
Joined: 9-June 04
Posts: 1
|
Oct 19 2004, 12:02 AM |
|
|
According to the people at tucows. It's a 60 million dollar per year industry.
You can backorder domains at: http://www.enom.com (look for their club drop service) http://www.pool.com (they'll email you a list with your key words every day. http://www.dotster.com (look for namewinner service) http://www.snapnames.com (in bed with Verisign) There are all kinds of services to help you do this. It's not a shady business by the way. There are a few shady characters in it, but I can't think of any industry that doesn't have a few of those. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
UntestedGroup: Members
Joined: 22-October 04
Posts: 3
|
Oct 22 2004, 11:12 PM |
|
|
It is amazing to me that in late 2004 people still do not understand that generic domain names receive targeted type-in traffic purely on the merrit of the keyword content within the domain-name itself. This is not high concept stuff. I am not talking about links, or old site residual traffic from previous development (which falls away almost immediately), rather I am refering to "Type-in Traffic". What is Type-in Traffic? Type-in traffic is You, right-now, typing a name ending in dot com just to see what is there; based on the weight of 'the name itself' as a stand-alone keyphrase. The very existence of the 4 domain auction houses mentioned in the previous post (Pool, Namewinner, Snapnames and Enom) is a direct result of the fact that inert traffic comes to generic domain names. Multiple parties wish to control that generic intellectual property and so an auction is held, resulting in a sale (often for thousands of dollars or many thousdands per name).
For example, say I owned www.australiatravel.com .. that name is generic, anyone can own it and it is descriptive of a thing. I might type it looking for Australian travel information. Even though the keyphrase "australia travel" may garner thousands of queries at the search engines each day (see: http://inventory.overture.com) the name by itself, with no search engine positioning or development may garner 'hundreds' of visits per day from curious Australia bound travelers, navigating the web using the domain name . Let us say 300 visits per day typing www.AustraliaTravel.com for the weight of the name. 300 visits X the value of that traffic.. ($1.02 per click visit according to Overture.com) = $360 per day or $131,400 per year.. multiply over many names and you understand the cashflow at stake to a bulk purchaser of generic expiring domain names. To give a real-world example of type-in traffic's power, look no further than Dealtime. Recently Dealtime.com rebranded to Shopping.com --immediately their sales and revenues shot up. This is not so much due to the fact that Dealtime.com was doing a better job as a company, rather their acquisition of a generic domain that garners many thousands of curious and qualified person-visits each day, amplified the scope of their business and that marriage brought significantly enhanced revenue. I am struck by how many very intelligent people in technology fail to make the simple connections illustrated in the two preceeding examples, either denying that the model exists or otherwise failing to capitalise on it. Not a week goes by without a colleague pointing out some cybersquatter that has registered their former domain name to capitalise on "their development" when in reality the new registrant has done nothing wrong other than being first to register a valuable generic piece of intellectual property based on the keyword within the domain-name. I hope this clarification helps some here to understand domain name traffic better. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
![]()
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 04:27 PM |
| Meet our Moderators: | cre8pc : projectphp : sanity : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB |