First, this doesn't have anything to do with the other site. I run an industry forum and people link out all the time to other sites about the work we do, the tools we use to do that work, etc.
I was considering adding a nofollow to the links appearing in those posts, but wonder if down the road that might put the potential hub/authority status of our site in question.
Well, I would imagine that of all our members, I'm probably the only one that even knows what a nofollow is, so there'd be a lot of educating I'd have to do first. The only beneficiary is the third party that the member links to (I like allowing live links).
I should clarify something - I would only do this with the content within posts - the link a person has in their sig or their profile to their own business would be unaffected.
Nofollow should be used for links that you do not add yourself. So comments, forum links, guest books, and so on. Anything outside of that, it is not fully intended. Will the hub die if the nofollow tag is used more loosely then above? I hope not.
I like the way Threadwatch has become a "hub" for interesting stuff in a way.
Generous linking out from the posts, no nofollow, ruthless but invisible editing in case of spam and NO SIGS.
That and they are basically all grown up people who don't feel the need to spam THOSE blog/forum comments with crappy links. What remains: interesting links to good resources, linked-to from paragraphs of on-topic and original text. Plus some funny stuff to keep things from getting dry.
Nick was great at that, wonder how Aaron will cope....
I'm gonna say that it will affect your website, hub or no hub. The reasoning is simple - with nofollow you alter the page structure google and other search engines see and analyse. So this is same as asking "if I strip all my h1 tags will it affect my rankings"; the answer is IMO obious.
<<ruthless but invisible editing in case of spam>>
Thats the key if you leave them but then it comes down to time. In a busy forum it may be near impossible to 1.) Catch every post with a link in it - and then 2.) Visit it to make sure its above board.
Wit_: Nicks content and mode of reporting is at a quality level where people don't need SIG links to be induced to post. Nick also attracts people with his personality, his bad boy image, his in-your-face and brass way of reporting.
Some forums need to offer SIG links so the provided inbound links and click though will induce people to post. Using a nofollow is just removing the inbound link portion of the reward, which we just saw how important that is to some people over at SEOChat.
In the long run SIG rewards are not enought to build a good forum, but they can help it get going.
While most of us realize that SIG inbounds are worthless the click though is some what important. A forum would have to be pretty high end to induce me to post if there is no SIGs plus a strict rule of no link drops.
I've gone out of my way to remove no-follow links on the publishing systems that I use (Usually WordPress).
I just don't understand the benefit of using it.
If someone tries to spam one of my sites, they will do it regardless as to whether or not I add a no-follow attribute to their links.
I also hate the fact that if someone were to link to an interesting resource on another site that they wont get credited for it.
QUOTE
Generous linking out from the posts, no nofollow, ruthless but invisible editing in case of spam and NO SIGS.
Absoutley. The fact that you can post live links on TW isn't what makes people post on there by any means, but the fact that users are treated like adults makes a big difference IMO.
I heard about it yesterday - Nick says it's because he doesn't have enough time to work on both TW and performancing.com, so agreed to sell it to Aaron...
It's a shame, but Aaron will do a great job I'm sure. At least it's not just part of a devshed network or something similiar.
Although I like the initial idea of the nofollow > "fighting spam" I don't like the way most people are using it. IMO there's a big difference between regular spam and things as sig links, forum links etc.
I think SE's will eventually treat nofollow just like a regular link. I don't use it on my forums but I have the option to select a user and add nofollow to his link posts and/or signature links. This way I can use it only for the users who aren't behaving without harming those thousands others.