> Fahrner Image Replacement

Previous Moderator/Hall of Fame

Group Icon
Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 31-August 02
Posts: 15,634
post Aug 11 2003, 05:54 PM
An interesting little screed plopped into the middle of an article on Digital Web Magazine:

QUOTE
A note from a graphic designer to coders and accessibility and usability experts who still don’t get it: You may try telling us that image-based text is against what the Web is about, but that’s blindly ignoring our needs, and the last time that happened the Web ended up with spacer.gifs and table hacks. Image is what pays us, and it pays well. Work with us, and we can create a better Web for everyone.


From In Defense of Fahrner Image Replacement
Offline Go to the top of the page
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies

Moderator Alumni

Group Icon
Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 14-November 02
Posts: 7,199
From: Los Angeles
post Dec 22 2003, 11:05 AM
This technique is aimed at providing an image for sighted viewers, and readable text (I'm assuming by an aural browser reader) for non-sighted visitors that is made non-visible by setting the display to "none".

Having read this briefly, here's my take on it: any technique that relies on hiding text with display: none runs the risk of penalization by search engines, if not today, then sometime. Why? Because it's too easy to abuse.

And yet, the technique increases usability for non-sighted viewers.

In essence, what we're seeing here is the apparent divide between increasing usability and requirements for taking advantage of free search engine traffic.

My suggestion, rather than hiding text, would be to provide a second page for non-sighted viewers (all text, along the "print this page" lines, and block search engines from indexing it). Or, a "click here to have this image read to you" popup. Or, if you can live with some kind of repetition on the page, just add the text on the page itself.
Offline Go to the top of the page

Posts in this topic
bragadocchio   Fahrner Image Replacement   Aug 11 2003, 05:54 PM
Adrian   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Aug 11 2003, 06:42 PM
Ron Carnell   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Aug 11 2003, 10:08 PM
bragadocchio   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Aug 11 2003, 11:52 PM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 09:56 AM
DianeV   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 11:05 AM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 11:28 AM
DianeV   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 11:31 AM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 11:49 AM
Ron Carnell   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 12:46 PM
DianeV   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 12:54 PM
Grumpus   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 01:05 PM
DianeV   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 01:16 PM
Adrian   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 01:39 PM
Grumpus   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 01:39 PM
DianeV   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 02:05 PM
Ron Carnell   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 22 2003, 02:59 PM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 23 2003, 05:39 AM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 23 2003, 07:17 AM
Grumpus   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 23 2003, 10:11 AM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Dec 23 2003, 10:29 AM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Jan 30 2004, 04:04 PM
richmc   Re: Fahrner Image Replacement   Jan 30 2004, 04:06 PM

Reply to this topic Start new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Jump to Forum:
 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th September 2010 - 08:47 PM
Meet our Moderators: cre8pc : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB
Cre8asite RSS Feed
Site Map  ·   Privacy Policy  ·   Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2002 - 2010