![]() ![]() |
Lead Technical Administrator![]() Group: Admin - Top Level
Joined: 23-January 03
Posts: 1,995
From: Michigan USA
|
Jun 19 2006, 02:26 PM |
|
|
I'm going to agree with others in essence, but disagree in specifics.
Yes, the Title should focus on the visitor, not just the search engine, but I doubt many visitors specifically go looking for Calls to Action or long, grammatically correct sentences in the web page Title. Just as with a book, just as with a movie, just as with a song on the radio, the web page Title should capture interest succinctly, even at times, tersely. Your call to action, I think, should be in the SERP description, not the SERP Title. The W3C recommends that the Title should "ideally be less than 64 characters in length." Google must agree because, while they index the entire Title, the SERPs only display up to 66 characters (they break a long Title at word boundaries, so in practice their maximum display length is usually less than the limit). In my opinion, even that can often be too long. My browsers truncate bookmarks at about 25 to 30 characters and your Title better include everything I need to know in those first 25-30 characters if you expect me to find your site in my disorganized morass of bookmarks. Additionally, when someone posts a link to the page on their site, their first inclination should be to use your page Title, and I think that's an inclination you don't want to discourage with an overly-worded, hard-to-fit-everywhere Title choice. While visitor requirements don't always mesh well with SE requirements, in this case I believe they do. I hate to use the term keyword density, which is too easily misunderstood, but the concept nonetheless is loosely applicable. Embed your keyword phrase in a thousand-word article and it's essentially lost, like one tree in a vast forest of trees. A visitor probably won't notice it and the search engines probably won't give it a lot of weight. Generally, I think it's much the same with using keywords in Titles. A keyword gains or loses importance relative to what surrounds it. Surrounding your keywords with a lot of verbiage lowers the impact of the keywords, both visually to the searcher and semantically to the search engines. Less is often more. Also, it's important, I think, to realize that you've asked two very different questions here. First, you asked, "Will search engines be able to separate the Auto Finance, Auto Loans, Online Auto Finance and Online Auto Loans keywords?" The answer to that is an unequivocal Yes, at least for Yahoo and Google. The major search engines will definitely find the keyword phrases, even when separated by other words (or punctuation, or HTML tags). Indeed, doing so is a common alternative to writing copy is that is otherwise too repetitive and too obviously written for search engines. However, you later asked, "But my concern is, will search engines give the same importance to 'auto finance' and 'auto loans' keywords after changing the TITLE tag?" The answer to that question is a much more equivocal No. The equivocation is because the words used to separate the keyword phrases matter, but generally speaking, a phase that the search engine has to "put back together" isn't going to weigh as heavily as the exact phrase. That's true in the copy and it's even more true, I think, in the Title. Finally, I would personally never try to target a single page for two different keyword phrases, not unless both were very uncompetitive. Your phrases, of course, are extremely competitive, so I would probably create different pages for each phrase. Ammon's 3-Page Search Engine Optimisation Technique is potentially one good way to do that, though there are others as well. Failing that (and the need, for such a competitive term, to attract links means it probably will fail initially), I would pick one keyword phrase and stick to it like a zealot. If ranking well for a high-traffic keyword is tough, ranking well for TWO such keywords approaches the impossible. Pick one, use it consistently in internal links and Titles and copy, and only target other big ticket items when your first choice bears fruit. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
![]()
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 04:28 PM |
| Meet our Moderators: | cre8pc : projectphp : sanity : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB |