![]() ![]() |
Moderator![]() ![]() Group: Moderators
Joined: 15-January 04
Posts: 4,736
From: Rimouski, Canada
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:30 PM |
|
|
Funny... While ago publishers found out that putting little images next to or above/under Google ads increased CTR. It's perfectly legit although as usual Google "requests" that you introduce some sort of seperation so as not to suggest one and another belong to Google.
Now the famous JenSense reports that Google is beta testing adding a picture in a verical ad unit. The screenshot she publishes shows a close-up of a flower ... with flower related ads under it. Imagine; the image topic targeting they can do is so much more precise than that performed by a publisher... |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Moderator![]() ![]() Group: Moderators
Joined: 15-January 04
Posts: 4,736
From: Rimouski, Canada
|
Jun 28 2006, 07:49 AM |
|
|
JenSense earlier posted about how Google wants publishers to deal with images close to ads.
To read another take on it would be interesting, yes. QUOTE That image in the screen shot just looked retarded and felt off balance, almost as nauseating as the themed ads where you could barely read the ads because of the color images behind them. I'm not sure they are the most effective. With vertical ads images next to them work best. With horizontal ones images above or below. Of course the question is not about the image itself but how much attention it draws to the ad. As for opt-out, JenSense reports that in the beta they run you don't have to make any changes to your account settings. For the moment that suggests no opt-out. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
![]()
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 05:36 PM |
| Meet our Moderators: | cre8pc : projectphp : sanity : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB |