![]() ![]() |
Moderator Alumni![]() Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 31-August 02
Posts: 15,634
|
Mar 1 2007, 03:19 AM |
|
|
Hi Mark,
None of the major search engines admit to using meta keywords tags to index pages, and none of those search engines provide any guidance at all to their usage. Back when search engines did use meta keywords tags, they did provide some guidance to their usage. It's been a few years. If you want to test to see if any of the search engines are using them, please feel free to experiment. I haven't seen any benefit to their usage. Here's a resource. Death Of A Meta Tag |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Star Member![]() ![]() Group: 1000 Post Club
Joined: 17-June 04
Posts: 1,760
From: Essex, UK
|
Mar 1 2007, 03:24 AM |
|
|
It's all pretty much covered in these topics:
Quick Start Guide to SEO SEO Myths. But recall that none of the main search engines take any notice of the keyword metatag so you might as well delete it from your documents. The key to the production of any webpage is to make it natural. If you want to discuss New York then just include the words in the page as if your were wrting an article. If your have something like 'In New York you can buyt the famous New York bagels on any of New York's streets' then the sentance is un-natural and may well be treated as an attempt at keyword stuffing. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Hall of Famer![]() ![]() Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 3-November 05
Posts: 3,461
From: CHeeseland
|
Mar 1 2007, 04:41 AM |
|
|
What's your take on Yahoo! > Search Help > Search Basics > How do I improve the ranking of my web site in the search results?:
QUOTE ... Use a "keyword" meta-tag to list key words for the document. Use a distinct list of keywords that relate to the specific page on your site instead of using one broad set of keywords for every page. ... Is Yahoo's help-page obsolete or is Yahoo the only engine left that uses the "keywords" meta-tag? If it's obsolete, it's confusing a lot of people John |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Moderator Alumni![]() Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 31-August 02
Posts: 15,634
|
Mar 1 2007, 05:05 AM |
|
|
Even on that page, they aren't really saying that they index the keywords. Maybe they do, but I wonder how much weight they would give them.
On this page, they left out the keywords. Don't know why if they are using them: http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/basics/basics-18.html QUOTE Pages Yahoo! Wants Included in its Index Original and unique content of genuine value Pages designed primarily for humans, with search engine considerations secondary Hyperlinks intended to help people find interesting, related content, when applicable Metadata (including title and description) that accurately describes the contents of a web page Good web design in general Probably worth doing some experimenting with. The internet archive listings for the page you've pointed to (and the one that I linked to) contains the same text regarding meta data - though it only goes back to 2004. Back in 1999, the Altavista folks were telling us: QUOTE What information does AltaVista actually index off of a Web page? Basically, we index all the HTML information on a page: All text, ALT text for images, links (hrefs and images), anchors, title, description and keyword META tags, applet and ActiveX object names, the page's URL, its host name (www.foo.com) and its domain name (com). The treatment of Usenet postings is similar but with different keywords. We do not index HTML comments. - http://web.archive.org/web/19990508193426/...s_webmaster.htm They were also showing us how to use them: QUOTE The META tag: Controlling how your Web page is indexed by AltaVista In the absence of any other information, AltaVista will index all words in your document (except for comments), and will use the first few words of the document as a short abstract. It is however possible for you to control how your page is indexed by using the META tag to specify both additional keywords to index, and a short description. Let's suppose your page contains: <META name="description" content="We specialize in grooming pink poodles."> <META name="keywords" content="pet grooming, Palo Alto, dog"> AltaVista will then do two things: It will index both fields as words, so a search on either poodles or dog will match. It will return the description with the URL. In other words, instead of showing the first couple of lines of the page, a match will look like the following: Pink Poodles Inc We specialize in grooming pink poodles. http://pink.poodle.org/ - size 3k - 29 Feb 96 AltaVista will index the description and keywords up to a limit of 1,024 characters. - http://web.archive.org/web/19990422070753/...addurl_meta.htm |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Hall of Famer![]() ![]() Group: Hall Of Fame
Joined: 3-November 05
Posts: 3,461
From: CHeeseland
|
Mar 1 2007, 10:55 AM |
|
|
That's very interesting, Ron. Thank you for that information.
In your opinion, or perhaps based on that test, would it make sense to use the keywords meta-tag or not (assuming the same keywords are already found on the page)? Or would the value be so minimal that it would not be worth spending the time on it? John Edit: Your keyword brought up an older thread on the subject: Metatags - that makes a lot of sense. This post has been edited by softplus: Mar 1 2007, 10:58 AM |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Star Member![]() ![]() Group: 1000 Post Club
Joined: 17-June 04
Posts: 1,760
From: Essex, UK
|
Mar 2 2007, 02:52 AM |
|
|
Remember this google article: Web Authoring Stats
In the metadata page is states: QUOTE ... we have two name values: keywords, which these days is mostly useless, ironically, and description, which is still somewhat useful. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Member![]() Group: Members
Joined: 9-May 06
Posts: 22
From: Winter Park, CO
|
Mar 2 2007, 05:27 PM |
|
|
Hi Mark,
In addition to the valuable resources pointed out already in this thread, I always keep an eye on SEOmoz. The "articles" section there provides a great starting place for SEO related items. Many SEOmozzers post here as well, there is definitely overlap. Here's my very general advice (I was in your exact position one year ago), and it's been stated in this thread already. Build a useful site for humans. Really focus 95% your energy in that direction. Follow all of the basic SEO techniques in doing so - semantically correct markup, separating content and presentation, unique title tags, seo friendly urls, etc, but focus on the humans first. There is so much info (good, bad & utterly horrific) out there concerning SEO that you can just drown trying to process it all. But every one of those articles worth its weight either begins or ends with the fact that the site has to be useful to the people visiting the site. Links, search engine indexing will follow, and you can always revisit these topics once the site is up and rolling. That's my take! Good luck! |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
UntestedGroup: Members
Joined: 1-March 07
Posts: 5
|
Mar 4 2007, 11:54 PM |
|
|
Thanks guys for this - really useful. And the idea of aiming it to help humans as a priority makes a lot of sense. That's who Google are trying to deliver to! Also suits me just fine, as that's what I really want to do anyway - provide my site visitors with useful information.
On that note, I have another question that perhaps someone can help me with? I wrote a page to sell a workshop that I run on 'learning how to learn fast - using accelerated learning'. I wrote it with the human visitor in mind. But when I finished, I realised that the word 'learning' is in there quite a lot! Knowing what I now know - will Google penalise me for this? I fear that it looks as if I've tried to stick the word 'learn' or 'learning' in a bit too much. As I say, I was just being natural, but I don't want it to think I'm taking a spammy approach! If anyone is happy to look at the page and comment, I'd find that really useful: http://www.epi-learning.com/epi-workshop-primer.htm Thanks, Mark |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
![]()
|
|
2 Pages 1 2 >
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 06:56 PM |
| Meet our Moderators: | cre8pc : projectphp : sanity : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB |