![]() ![]() |
Solid Contributor![]() Group: Members
Joined: 27-December 06
Posts: 54
From: New York
|
Mar 19 2007, 10:53 AM |
|
|
QUOTE One problem I find on FaceBook and it also affects MyBlogLog is that it's very difficult to find anyone else who may be there. In each case the search function is rudimentary. So for FaceBook unless you know the exact e-mail address under which someone has registered themselves, you cannot find them. I realize that is done for security reasons, but it makes it very much tougher to make connections. Facebook's search is not bad at all (compared to sites like LinkedIn, which I would imagine you're referring to?) You can find Facebook users by first name, last name, firstname+lastname combination, group membership (search for something like Digg and you'll find groups with students who have Digg accounts). You can search based on favorite interests, favorite TV shows, and even quotes. I would say that the search on FB is not rudimentary at all. However, the limitation of FB is that unless you're networked with the particular individual (based on their settings or preferences and your own network setting, e.g. New York, NY), you won't be able to actually see their profile. So it might say that you and John Doe have the same interest in a particular music group (and "Music" will be highlighted in the search results), but you won't be able to see John Doe's profile page (it will not be clickable) unless you establish a friendship. Many students will not reciprocate a friend request unless you give them a compelling reason to do so. I remember friending up a fellow SEO, and she sent me a message awhile ago saying "Who are you?" I can't say that was the first time either. Another thing is that students of this day and age are more careful about who they befriend. If you say "Hey, I love the same music group as you," they might even block you (it happened to a friend of mine). They don't like who they perceive as "stalker" types. So in all, you really need to proceed carefully and have a good gameplan. It might be a good idea to get introduced through other mutual friends, if you even want to go that route, because initiating directly can be extremely tricky. After all, there are real stalkers out there |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
Membership Admin & Moderator![]() ![]() Group: Membership Admin & Moderator
Joined: 6-January 07
Posts: 2,189
|
Apr 13 2007, 06:26 PM |
|
|
One month later: I luv FaceBook!
QUOTE Someone decided to Digg that post and all hell broke loose. ...12 hours later, over 23,000 people have been to this blog. Kim Krause Berg : 20 January 2007 : Don’t Digg Being Dugg We know that SM can drive traffic spikes. My concern has always been: one, the lack of converting a measurable amount of that 'one referenced link' traffic to repeat 'bookmark' customers; and two, the extremely poor ad/aff conversion rate of that type of traffic. Thus my experiment with FaceBook. It has been a month and there are some interesting stats: * traffic: as mentioned previously the growth (and collapse) is much slower than Digg et al topping out just under 8000 FB referrals/day after 10-days. It has tapered off since then, 09-April being just over 1200. Total FB referrals 09-March thru 09-April inclusive: 120,000+. Of special note is the conversion to bookmark/type-in traffic. That has grown steadily sitting at 4700+/uniques for 09-April. There were another 800+ from AOL on the 9th - likely also bookmark traffic. The average return visit rate is just over twice per week. This puts bookmarked/type-in new unique customers acquired from this FB marketing intiative at approximately 15,000 (possibly to 20,000 with AOL). Results: major traffic growth curve rather than spike; significant user conversion from FB links to their own bookmark links. * backlinks: under a hundred. Most are from personal blogs, some from uni personal pages, none (yet) found from 'conventional' sites. Results: as poor as expected. * conversions: * FB: both ads and affs lower (than niche averages). * AOL: ads above, affs below (niche AOL benchmarks). * bookmark/type-in: ads below, affs well up (niche bookmark benchmarks) * coupon downloads 3x normal (redemption rate still unknown). * directory usage: way way up. Fully a third followed at least one directory link off-site and/or downloaded address, map, etc. Likely short term but nice to see. Results: much higher ROI than expected. Well worth doing. Overall Results: I am quite pleased with the outcome of my little experiment. |
||
| Offline | ![]() |
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 09:15 AM |
| Meet our Moderators: | cre8pc : projectphp : sanity : Black Phoenix : bwelford : EGOL : Ruud : rustybrick : AbleReach : swainzy : joedolson: eKstreme: dazzlindonna : SEOigloo: iamlost : RisaBB |