Using Dot Net Instead of Dot Com
#1
Posted 01 March 2006 - 02:54 PM
Regards
John EH!
#2
Posted 01 March 2006 - 03:33 PM
#3
Posted 01 March 2006 - 03:40 PM
e.g. "we're yahoo.net" (the other guys)
#4
Posted 01 March 2006 - 04:34 PM
Respree, in this case, it would be "we're the real yahoo" but just didn't snatch up the name in time. We're the creator and inventor of this product but the name has not been patented. I agree however, that confusion is a good possibility with people automatically going to dot com.
Going to have to do some more brainstorming here. Thanks guys.
John EH!
#5
Posted 01 March 2006 - 05:04 PM
It is just too easy to send traffic to the .com site by accident if you use .net.
CiCi
#6
Posted 02 March 2006 - 10:13 AM
Thanks
The Real John EH!
#7
Posted 09 March 2006 - 04:55 PM
I'd definitely avoid getting the .net if a competitor already has the .com - way to much confusion and I guarantee you'll loose traffic to them.
#9
Posted 09 March 2006 - 06:15 PM
Edited by bwelford, 09 March 2006 - 06:15 PM.
#10
Posted 09 March 2006 - 06:27 PM
We're the creator and inventor of this product but the name has not been patented.
I don't think the other company would be able to do anything at all.
If you were to use someone else's trademark in that manner, that would be a different story.
CiCi
#13
Posted 30 March 2006 - 05:03 PM
John EH!
P S
by the way, I got "bearmugs" because "beermugs" was already taken.
#14
Posted 10 April 2006 - 10:23 AM
did you try registering it?
#15
Posted 05 May 2006 - 12:03 AM
Of course, only the .com versions. The .org, .net, etc domains are free. The registered domains are either down, have a construction page (This is your site and it is empty) or have a link farm (with searches) on them.
Which brings me to the question, is it fairly safe to purchase the .org version of the domain?
How high is the probability that the .com domain owners will end up with copying my content and swindling my potential customers?
Can a guy from any country purchase the .org domains?
Also, what would be the difference between the .org and .net domains? Are .org domain companies perceived as respectable organizations and .net domains are just commercial?
Thanks.
P.S. Yeah, I am thinking of creating a better .com domain, but all the domains are taken =)
Edited by A.N.Onym, 05 May 2006 - 12:10 AM.
#16
Posted 05 May 2006 - 12:52 AM
Which brings me to the question, is it fairly safe to purchase the .org version of the domain?
How high is the probability that the .com domain owners will end up with copying my content and swindling my potential customers?
That's a little like moving to a new neighborhood, and hoping that you have good neighbors. I would guess that you could try to do a little research, like looking them up in a whois search, and seeing if you can find other footprints that they may have left on the web.
Can a guy from any country purchase the .org domains?
Anyone should be able to purchase a .org address, regardless of where they are from.
The FAQ from the Public Interest Registry goes into some more details. Of course, .org names are intended for nonprofit and noncommercial organizations, but there are businesses which have registered and use .org domains.
Also, what would be the difference between the .org and .net domains? Are .org domain companies perceived as respectable organizations and .net domains are just commercial?
The FAQ I linked to above goes into a lot of detail on .orgs. As for .net domains, those were originally intended for Internet service providers, but many other businesses use them, too.
It can be difficult to come up with a good .com address because so many are taken.
#17
Posted 05 May 2006 - 01:10 AM
Looks like I need to do some more research, eh.
It is just frustrating that I can't get a domain that noone is using.
The domain owners I have contacted via the whois info haven't replied yet.
#18
Posted 05 May 2006 - 02:44 AM
In this case it would be a .org instead of a .net, but the effect is still likely to be the same. Maybe telling us what you are aiming for in terms of a name can allow us to maybe help you think up a better name?I think choosing the .net when the .com is already taken raises the potential issue of confusing branding.
#19
Posted 05 May 2006 - 05:25 AM
However, the ideal .com domain names are already taken with all the other ones being free.
I was actually more inclined to think up an unregistered domain name than to get an .org or a .neg domain.
I was thinking of a 'call to action' domain. The verb (like, increase) and the noun (sales, for instance) are predefined and are not subject to change. All combinations, like 'verbnoun', 'verbwebnoun', 'verbmynoun' have already been taken. I was actually thinking of using hyphens, but, still, don't like them much.
That's why I'd rather go for a new domain name, instead of risking future branding (or more) issues.
Thanks for your help
#20
Posted 05 May 2006 - 08:20 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users







