Jump to content

Cre8asiteforums Internet Marketing
and Conversion Web Design


Photo

When Marketing Is Unwanted


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:43 PM

Last I checked, a blog post I wrote has been dugg over 1000 times and is one of the popular ones in the Digg Design category.

That might be something to celebrate, except all I've done is brought unintended traffic to my blog (over 23,000 visitors in 12 hours), who followed the link to the resource I wrote about. I was happy to present that resource because it has been a goldmine of information.

However, Digg users blasted it to hell.

Not only did they attack the resource for its site design, my own blog comments went out of control with every possible ugly kind of link and trackback to porn and splogs you can imagine. I had to close comments in that blog post.
/
I've apologized to the University at Digg, where the children are writing their comments.

I've updated by blog post with why I had to close comments.

I've written I Don’t Digg Being Dugg

Can someone please explain to me how this activity is a positive, helpful marketing tool?

I didn't Digg my own post. Someone else did. I'm not sure how it caught fire, but at the moment, there are over 1000 diggs for it and several more per minute. My server has held up.

Which part of this experience am I supposed to be enjoying?

Why would anyone want me to write about THEIR resource, only to have it be attacked and dragged through the streets?

#2 JohnMu

JohnMu

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 3518 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:06 PM

Careful, Kim - "I don't digg being dugg" could hit digg :)

You might want to implement something like this:
http://sonspring.com...deflecting-digg

There are a few other people that do something similar... I think that those Digg-users who would like your site will be able to find it through many other ways or will know to enter the URL manually... You could however, redirect it to a page explaining your reasons for the redirect.

John

#3 ukdaz

ukdaz

    Light Speed Member

  • Members
  • 738 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:09 PM

I'm not sure why people have done this... possibly out of envy that you found it first?

I wouldn't worry too much though, as a decent person its natural you might wonder why your post attracted a**holes like the ones you got posting onyour blog... at the end of the day, they're just a**holes and likely not much more, so maybe take pleasure out of that?

Instead just think of the help you gave us... without you its unlikely I'd have found this resource you so kindly pointed out. For that I (for one) am grateful. :)

Cheers!

Daz

#4 EGOL

EGOL

    Professor

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 5442 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:30 PM

Careful, Kim - "I don't digg being dugg" could hit digg tongue.gif

lol... Right!

I think that softplus and ukdaz are right. Diggers can be a cynical group. A couple of things on my site have been dugg and the results have been great. Lots of immediate links (a few thousand) and within 48 hours my content was featured on some really good sites. Then my rankings shot up.

Most of those links were temporary but they gave a great initial boost and the good rankings that resulted have held as a few high quality links took hold.

I am looking forward to launching a few more digg bait items on my site soon.

#5 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:32 PM

John, I'm afraid to look to see if the anti-Digg post got Dugg :)

Eric and I are trying to find the silver lining in this...and haven't found it yet. My blog is getting the "Digg Effect", but nobody is staying there. They see the resource I wrote about, and go there.

That's fine for the University I wrote about and I'm happy for them. I just hate how Digg users attacked the University site. They never would have, had I not written about it.

Had someone not Dugg on my post.

In new anti-Digg post, I wrote:

Another way of looking at it is this. You take a walk through a park and quietly enjoy it and the experience. Perhaps you will recommend it to someone else. Or, you can visit the park and leave graffiti all over the benches, paths, and toss toilet paper into the tree branches.

This is what people are doing nowadays. The Internet continues to reflect the physical world. No one is held accountable.

So. Which part of this Digg activity am I supposed to be happy about, now that something I wrote has officially been slaughtered there?


I'm not the type of person who brings hell to someone's door. I'm sure the University can tolerate the Digg comment abuse, but why should they have to?

As soon as posted again in my blog, the comment spam went crazy again. I may have to turn off all comments on my blog because of the "Digg Effect".

The link you showed me is interesting. I've read it. It is kinda like throwing out the baby with the bathwater approach and even he changed his mind about doing it. So what recourse do we have?

Daz, thank you. I know that MY readers appreciated that resource. I wrote the post for them.

Is the purpose of Digg, for marketing, to be a traffic junkie? Doesn't targeted, qualified traffic matter anymore?

#6 JohnMu

JohnMu

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 3518 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:43 PM

Ignore them, Kim - or block them if you don't want to have to ignore them. They are most likely just there for the ride, for the entertainment -- which is cheapest by being childish.

But look at the Digg-count and look at the number of comments (at least on Digg; I don't know what you deleted on your site): there are still more people who "digg" your amazing link than those who think your "page is ugly"... Let the latter think whatever they want. If some kid at random came up to you and told you that your car was ugly, would you even bother to think about it?

Maybe you need to add an IQ test to your comments (add two single-digit numbers)?

John

If you do not want to block digg-referrers altogether, perhaps it would make sense to pre-moderate your comments, at least for digg-referrers? I think I stumbled over a WP plugin that does that; or you could do it like that in general.

John

#7 Guest_joedolson_*

Guest_joedolson_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:49 PM

Being dugg, I think, is tantamount to taking your website into a boys high school for critique - there are some bright, generous kids who will appreciate it. There are some teachers who'll really get into it and make lucid comments. There are a whole lot of jackasses who will go out of their way to criticize.

(I say boys high schools because the target audience for Digg is definitely predominantly male...)

Personally, I've never gone to any great effort to get Dugg. Fact of the matter is that I have as much work as I can keep up with already - just getting more _traffic_ seems pretty pointless. I'm not interested in what Digg has to offer - if something happens, and I get Dugg, that's fine - but I'll mostly ignore it.

(I do wonder, however, whether this will have a long term impact on my own traffic...I've got three or four links from that list...)

Edited by joedolson, 20 January 2007 - 02:50 PM.


#8 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:54 PM

If you do not want to block digg-referrers altogether, perhaps it would make sense to pre-moderate your comments, at least for digg-referrers? I think I stumbled over a WP plugin that does that; or you could do it like that in general.


Comments are already moderated at my blog. Nothing appears unless I approve it. However, I'm being bombarded with a high volume of nonsense due to Digg. They aren't commenting to my blog, itself. All the comments I'm finding are about the University resource I wrote about. It's their site being attacked by Diggers. That's why I'm unhappy, as obviously I would not have wished this for them.

I turned off comments so I don't have to moderate them either, for that particular post. The anti-Digg one hasn't hit the airwaves yet, so all is fairly calm so far.

Egol, your experience sounds more positive. As I said, I'm finding that the majority of linking is to the resource I wrote about, but there's still a number of more normal actions where the person will link to the resource and credit "Cre8pc" with the find and link to the blog. Those are nice :)

Still can't believe the server is holding up (it's at Bluehost). Kudos to them. I've never had this kind of traffic to my blog before.

Out of curiosity, where to you get the math thingys for comments, like what Bill has in his? I need a step like that in my comment process.

#9 Brad

Brad

    Mach 1 Member

  • Members
  • 354 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:56 PM

Frankly, I think Digg is mostly inhabited by plaid-on-plaid-polyester-leisure-suit-wearing internet marketers, *.spammers and other internet weeds. :naughty: Do you really care what they think? All they want to do is destroy other people's things or comment spam (same thing).

More normal people interested in news are probably at Reddit anyway.

#10 bragadocchio

bragadocchio

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 15634 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:04 PM

The thing is though, Kim, Digg isn't a marketing tool

It's just a place for people to hang out and point out sites and stories and videos. A good number of those people are self-centered and immature .

Some of the people at Digg think that they are the center of the universe. As one commenter there wrote: "ignore it, it's just digg bait." As if your purpose in writing that post was solely to have it land on Digg.

Here's someone else who was less than pleased by a post on his site being dugg:

Digg Scares Me (403 Go Away!)

The last thing from my site that was dugg had enlightening comments such as:

A message to the submitter of this article......die



If digg closed down tomorrow, and the children who wrote comments like that had no place to express their dull witticisms, that would be fine with me.


As for comments on my blog, I moderate all of my comments. As good as Aksimet is, some real spam garbage comes through. I will publish a comment if it is critical, but if it's completely off topic or childish or a link drop, I don't think twice about it, and just delete it.

Out of curiosity, where to you get the math thingys for comments, like what Bill has in his? I need a step like that in my comment process.


I had to remove the one that I was using - it wasn't working correctly.

#11 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:08 PM

Do you really care what they think?


No. What's got me concerned is that they are attacking a resource I wrote about, and I had no way of stopping that from happening. Nor did it even occur me for a second that a little blog post I wrote would be dugg over a 1117 (just checked) times. It's taken on a life of its own, with an intent that doesn't even remotely come close to resembling my own.

Maybe people love this stuff?

If I wrote about one of you, to feature your blog, resource, site, something you did....and it was dugg by somebody, and the result was that your blog, resource, site, something you did thing was publically degraded, attacked, spit on and otherwise defamed, how would you feel?

This can happen on other Web 2.0 entities as well. I keep questioning the logic and ethics of it :)

I drive myself nuts. :)

#12 JohnMu

JohnMu

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 3518 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:14 PM

That's the link I was looking for, thanks Bill.

Kim, if immature traffic came my way through a link on your site, I would be honored to be linked to from your site. You placed the link. You did not create the traffic, it just followed a link to you and a link to me. Don't worry yourself crazy about this -- you're just doing a good job and it happened to attract a bunch of weirdos (loud) as well as all the good people (quiet and happy).

John

Edited by softplus, 20 January 2007 - 03:14 PM.


#13 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:14 PM

The thing is though, Kim, Digg isn't a marketing tool


I guess there's a lot of confusion about that. One of the things I kept hearing at SES Chicago was that Digg was a marketing tool and I "needed" it to get more business.

I doubt any of this experience will bring more business :)

Your mathy thingy broke, Bill?

If anyone has alternatives, please share. Readers of this thread can all benefit if they need help.

Added> Eric and I went to Digg Scares Me Eric thinks I should do what that guy did, only make a "U-turn", and send the Digger back to Digg :naughty:

#14 JohnMu

JohnMu

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 3518 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:22 PM

I don't have Wordpress so all I can do is copy links, but Matt Cutts uses Math Comment Spam Protection ( http://www.mattcutts...ged-my-captcha/ )

John

#15 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:41 PM

I just heard from someone who covers social media, and who is a Digg user. He wrote to "apologize for the actions of the immature 12-year old fanboys that ruin the experience for all us content producers."

I won't convey identity, but he wrote a nice note in which he understood my frustration with this experience and could relate to it, but still hopes I don't give up on Digg...or at least, keep promoting improvements for it.

That, I'm happy to do!

It was very cool to hear from a sane Digg user, I must say :applause:

(meanwhile, stats show my blog traffic since Midnight...28,000 visitors and 1239 diggs...)

#16 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:26 PM

Thought this might be interesting to note.

Chris Sherman on Social Search: New Marketing Opportunities

Tagging...click-through tracking...search history features. These are just some of the ways that search engines are now following human behavior on the web. It's the latest development in search marketing - and successful marketers have already figured out how to drive new traffic from it.

Find out why Social Search is the hottest thing on the web these days - and how you can reach new markets and opportunities using social search strategies.



#17 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 06:37 PM

Update:

A friend of mine has been analyzing my server logs, as this event came at a time when he was already researching social media events such as this.

The benefit to me, personally, as measured by conversions (inquires into services, for ex.), is zero.

There's still above ave. traffic into my blog, but of the nearly 4000 visitors, approx. 150 of them landed on the blog homepage or the stories I posted yesterday. The rest came from Digg and others like it, to the specific post I wrote about another website. 98% of that traffic immediately left my blog to checkout the resource I covered.

Of the number of actual Diggs (I stopped looking...its over 1500 I think), only a handful of that number were Digg commenters who trashed the resource, and later me for speaking out against their behavior, (about 40 comments.) They were largely abusive and ugly to read. Interestingly, those Diggers felt fully justified to trash the resource I wrote about in my blog, and yet called me colorful names for questioning them.

#18 SEOigloo

SEOigloo

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 2100 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 06:59 PM

I'm so sorry you're having this headache, Kim.

What is it about the total lack of personal, real-life accountability the Internet engenders that brings out the absolute worst in so many people? It's hard to believe that the spam our blog gets is a true representation of how the spammers would speak, face-to-face, to a stranger. It makes me wonder if people have demonic alter-egos that surface when the opportunity to be faceless is presented. The spam we get is just nuts and very obnoxious. I really appreciate you posting about this, as we have never felt confident about the benefits of a place like Digg.

Miriam

#19 A.N.Onym

A.N.Onym

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Invited Users For Labs
  • 4003 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 09:55 PM

You know, this thread nearly killed any desire to get dugg. I am sure I can find a more respectable resource to get attention from.

Though getting thousands of links may be tempting, but I'd rather get noticed by more sensible folks. Then again, there will always be bullies in a fairly large crowd, right?

#20 sanity

sanity

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 6889 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:36 PM

Thanks for sharing Kim. After hearing so many positive things about Digg it's good to hear an opposite viewpoint. Just a shame you had such a negative experience.

I am sure I can find a more respectable resource to get attention from.


Hear, hear. :applause:

#21 iamlost

iamlost

    The Wind Master

  • Site Administrators
  • 4622 posts

Posted 22 January 2007 - 01:45 AM

I sympathetically diagnose Web2 Traumatic Stress Disorder, Kim. Once the servers settle I recommend a good soak, a gooder massage, and a goodest friend. Repeat as necessary.

I have come to dislike most social media. My sites have been slashdotted and Dugg and everything in between - in every case the costs far outweighed the returns. I prefer quiet qualified individuals to rampaging mobs.

I dispute the concept of 'smart mob' (coined by Howard Rheingold to describe intelligent group behaviour through technological networking). A mob is a mob and it's collective intelligence is inversely proportional to its size. Without direction and discipline (what the military call command and control), i.e. the Admins and Mods here, you get swarming (FLAMING) from 'Lord of the Flies' cannibal children (Dugg) or open corruption (DMOZ) or elastic truth (Wikipedia) etc. Note: the last two may be getting addressed - whether in time remains to be seen.

There are currently three loud support groups for 'Web 2.0' social applications:
* those who created the application and have their fingers crossed it will take-off and they will make or get bought-out for zillions before the crowd moves on - and it always does.
* those who first find it a useful place to hang and clique-up. Mostly those youngsters who would in yesteryear be hanging out on the corner or pool hall or chess club (for the record I did all three).
* those who, like SEOs marketing themselves, see an opportunity to game a system.

Good on them.
If they would just turn the freaking volume down.
Note to loud brash SEOs: Ssssshhh. Can't you see I'm hunting wabbits?

#22 sanity

sanity

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 6889 posts

Posted 22 January 2007 - 10:10 PM

Peter Da Vanzo blogged about Kim's experience and raised an interesting question:

If the aim is to be Dugg, would a client enjoy the possibility of negative fallout?



With the amount some companies are charging for "link bait" type services I wonder how clients are finding being Dugg - or similar. It almost warrants a thread of it's own.

#23 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 22 January 2007 - 10:36 PM

I saw that, and also felt it was a great question!

How many marketers share the potential risks to their clients, when they strive to be Dugg?

#24 Adrian

Adrian

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Invited Users For Labs
  • 5779 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 07:14 AM

Part of the issue here, is that you're really not interested in the Digg audience, Kim. On the whole, they are not the sort of people I think you write your blog for, therefore traffic from Digg, for you is useless.

Some of our magazines very much cater for the Digg market, among others. Some people in here are pretty desperate to get Dugg and get the surge of traffic! Negative comments and all.

I think clients who cater to the kind of audience that also visit Digg, are expectant and used to the negative side of those communities....
Some of them are quite successful at keeping the tone of the conversation friendly and positive, some will actually strive for that controvosey.

For you, Kim, I don't see Digg as a marketing tool. They frequently are people who devour an article (if they even get that far) then scoot off back to Digg to 'discuss it' and move on to the next Digg article.
Many of our sites are always happy of that burst traffic, even if barely any of it sticks, I don't think you're interested in the same goals that they are though.

#25 JohnMu

JohnMu

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Hall Of Fame
  • 3518 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 07:40 AM

I just had to think of you when I ran into ...

I pledge to use Digg, Reddit, Delicious and the like as a shortcut to link building. The Digg community is a bunch of annoying little wankers but I will play the game until my sites all have TrustRank out the wazoo from dozens of successful link baits.

(from http://tropicalseo.c...-seo-manifesto/ )

Is that what it's about? getting links from a bunch of immature kids but at least they're links?

Think you have it right, Adrian. Works for some, doesn't for others. Like everything else :)

John

#26 A.N.Onym

A.N.Onym

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Invited Users For Labs
  • 4003 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 08:13 AM

You have to remember that the links you get to your dugg articles are from related website on the topic (mostly), from within context and may bring targeted traffic (unlike Digg?). You can't discount them that easily.

#27 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 12:11 PM

If I wrote something in my blog or wrote an article, that was my own creation, and it was picked up by Digg, before this experience happened, and even to some extent now, I'd be THRILLED!

Because the attention would be on Kim, the writer and what I wrote.

This experience had nothing to do with Kim. It was about the resource I wrote about, which I did not write about for marketing purposes.

I've had my blog posts and a few articles (the funny ones) Dugg before. They never go past 20 or so Diggs, and had been passed around gently. I would get a few links, and some interest in something that was mine and be all excited about that.

I didn't Digg my own blog post. I wasn't thinking of Digg or any social bookmarking site when I wrote it. I think that's partly what makes me so angry. I wrote for MY readers, who love to find a stockpile of resources they can refer to for their work. I didn't write so that the resource I shared could be hung up in public view to be dismembered. That really freaks me out. I don't purposely bring harm in real life. I'm the kind who can't stand it when all the plants die in the Fall. No kidding, I bring tons of my hanging plants and deck plants into the house so they won't die so fast :)

It would be a mistake to say I hate social marketing. The post I wrote that was dugg had to have its comments closed because it became a target for abuse by Diggers carrying on about the resource I shared. They'd link to their porn sites...that sort of thing. I didn't want to spend my entire Saturday moderating crap comments. I mouthed off a bit in the post instead about what was happening.

By Sunday, I made a nice discovery over at http://del.icio.us/. I will often submit my blog posts there for tagging and I had sent up the one I wrote on that resource. I found that hundreds of people quietly bookmarked that post. No comments...just a link to my blog post if they were interested in that resource I covered.

So, I removed the part where I ranted, out of respect for those who just wanted to remember where they had found that resource. It was those people I had intended it for. I didn't expect anyone to link to my site, however. I figured if someone found the resource I wrote about useful, they'd bookmark that resource. In other words, I didn't expect any reward. I had no planned mission.

Several years ago, someone told me that if I EVER blogged about them, they'd sue me. That experience comes to my mind often. We don't hear about people or places like that. We hear about the link and traffic junkies.

That person made their request because they wanted no part of being judged by strangers that do not know them. After this experience, I understand that wish even more. How could I know writing about something that was not mine would bring that something a public lashing, along with the tons of links they also got?

#28 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 10:41 PM

Matt Bailey takes a data approach to this in Social Media – Under the Microscope

Despite the higher rates of conversion and engagement by visitors who are referred by external site links, social media site links consistently yielded the lowest rates of engagement and no conversions.


Social Media provides a “sugar-high” approach to building links, much less an online business. It provides a lot of traffic, very fast. However the vast majority of that traffic is not engaged, rarely stays for more than a few seconds and can sometimes be rude. If page views are the goal for a site, social media will provide a lot of one-off page views, but rarely more than that. Comparatively, good external links provide traffic that will view multiple pages – typically many more than social media traffic.



#29 A.N.Onym

A.N.Onym

    Honored One Who Served Moderator Alumni

  • Invited Users For Labs
  • 4003 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 10:43 PM

Kim, if you write about exact facts you can prove and someone sues you, you are only in the win here (both the attention, the links and such). Remember Aaron Wall?

Then again, I believe you'd rather not get sued to get the attention, eh.

I am saying that you shouldn't be afraid to blog. It is your blog, and as long as you post correct information, you are fine.

And once again, I am reminded of Dean Hunt being asked to remove a blog post, because it outranked someone else. Weird stuff.

#30 DonnaFontenot

DonnaFontenot

    Peacekeeper Administrator

  • Site Administrators
  • 3816 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:36 AM

About a week and a half ago, I got dugg for the first time. Of course, my server crashed, and I spent the rest of the day making sure it stayed up. I gained maybe 3 links out of it, and that's about it. Funny thing was that of all the things I've ever posted that may have been digg-worthy, that one tiny post was not one of them. Why it hit the front page, I'll never know. But the result was simply a headache for me, with no substantial gain from it at all. If I never experience the Digg effect again, I won't be sad. And I most certainly won't bother to use it as a marketing tool. What a waste of time. Of course, for some, it may be useful, but for me, it was a waste of my time (dealing with server issues).

#31 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:58 AM

I think every marketer should experience the joys of the Digg Effect over a weekend and the sheer thrill of "Not now honey, I'm being Dugg", "Sorry kids, can't go here, here, here, and there, because any minute the server is going to crash", to "God I hope the kids don't see their mom being called [insert junk word here]", be subjected to automated comments scum with references to things like having sex with animals, and oh yeah, the part about not having time for spouse, family, your own self over an entire weekend. Just imagine the love there.

Makes those zero conversions and no visitors time spent on your site really really worth it. :wacko:

I highly recommend social media marketing to those who have no families who need them and especially to those who have patient spouses or partners who have no problem with that laptop glued to your body.

I would never pay anyone to subject me to this.

However!

A campaign designed to target the right media to the right target market is nothing to sneeze at.

Trying to be objective and fair, my site doesn't belong in Digg, nor did I put it there. That was the only site I found that handled itself poorly. Del.ious.us gets high marks for driving in thoughtful and qualified links. I continue to be impressed with that site.

#32 egain

egain

    Gravity Master Member

  • Members
  • 121 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 10:30 AM

Trying to be objective and fair, my site doesn't belong in Digg, nor did I put it there. That was the only site I found that handled itself poorly. Del.ious.us gets high marks for driving in thoughtful and qualified links. I continue to be impressed with that site.


Think you hit the nail on the head with that comment. As you said there are going to be some sites that fit better with the Digg "mindset" than others. Social Media has its uses, Digg, Del.icio.us etc, all have their place, its when, how and if its implemented that is important.

At the end of day, many of us are marketters for third parties. I doubt that many clients will thank you for a never ending trail of potentially negative publicity and spam, if a campaign utilising such channels were implemented

#33 tamar

tamar

    Whirl Wind Member

  • Members
  • 54 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 02:00 PM

This has been a very interesting debate (and I just blogged about it myself). On one hand, I wholeheartedly dislike the Digg community (I blogged about that too -- twice). I am hurt by some of the negative comments there. But on the other hand, when you want to be known (and most people who blog or have some sort of web presence do), Digg can be leveraged to build yourself that exposure.

After the Digg domain-banning incident in late December, I removed the Digg button on my personal blog. I am not sure I'll put it back; I don't think my personal blog invites Digg submissions (kind of like the way you see it, Kim). But Digg users will submit good sites regardless, because they want to be noticed: their Digg ranking goes up after they submit your quality content.

The few things you can do, I suppose, is to ensure that that unwanted marketing is never actually received. One idea is to ban traffic coming from a digg.com referrer. Another is to ask Digg to ban your domain (I'm not sure if this works but I think it should).

I still don't like the Digg 'fanboy' community, but I've found some pretty darn good things from Digg and I likely would not have found those had it not been for it.

#34 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 02:52 PM

I'm surely out-opinioned, what with SearchEngineLand constantly coming out with pro-social media marketing posts, and I'm cool with that.

I've lived through the rise and fall of many a search engine. I can survive the rise and crash of the new breed of them too.

I can't even very well sit here and boo hoo a community of folks, seeing as how I own one. Mine isn't unfriendly, however :rolleyes:

And speaking of survival, it appears as though this competition is hot between me and Jill

Does anybody even know what we're voting on???? :wacko:

#35 Cath

Cath

    Mach 1 Member

  • Members
  • 370 posts

Posted 26 January 2007 - 08:16 PM

Looks like you've been dugg again Kim, I was looking through and found a link to this thread, sorry I don't know how to link to it, and now I can't find it again, those pages move pretty fast.

Edit: Found it again

Edited by Cath, 26 January 2007 - 08:31 PM.


#36 cre8pc

cre8pc

    Dream Catcher Forums Founder

  • Admin - Top Level
  • 13553 posts

Posted 26 January 2007 - 09:32 PM

Saw that show up in my logs and decided to have some fun with it...

Let’s Digg Him to be Funny

Granted, the first few versions of my blog entry were lots more colorful, with some GREAT adjectives and references to body parts.

But, somebody has to be the grown up person :naughty:

#37 iamlost

iamlost

    The Wind Master

  • Site Administrators
  • 4622 posts

Posted 26 January 2007 - 11:47 PM

I, however, am much too immature to be grown up so:


I Digg you
You Reddit me
We're a social family
With a traffic surge
And a link from me to you
Won't you say Youtube me too?

You're socially del.icio.us.
Now go AWAY.

I lie in my bio
You do in yours too
We're a MySpace family
With a Facebook move
And a Technorati cloud view
Won't you bow down to Web 2?

You're socially del.icio.us.
Now go AWAY.

I Flickr you
You Webjay me
We're a Second Life family
With avatars so real
And our private lives on hold
Won't we be datamined gold?

You're socially del.icio.us.
Now go AWAY.

:angel:



RSS Feed

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users