Have skimmed it and am now settling in for in depth analysis.
My head hurts already
Edited by iamlost, 08 June 2007 - 08:05 PM.
Jump to content
Posted 08 June 2007 - 08:25 PM
Posted 08 June 2007 - 08:56 PM
Posted 10 June 2007 - 08:39 AM
Posted 17 June 2007 - 10:43 AM
You really have mastered this area and like many other areas in website design it's very complex. Reading your post and the associated links was a real learning experience. Thanks for that.
Posted 17 June 2007 - 05:25 PM
Posted 17 June 2007 - 06:29 PM
14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages. [Priority 3]
Guideline 14.3: You may use any accessible "style" you wish, including styles that are not "consistent."
We see no accessibility benefit in requiring only a certain markup among several viable choices.
Posted 17 June 2007 - 09:00 PM
Samurai are leaving open the option of varying design and page layout, the WCAG are not. Being consistent may be best, or not. Let the circumstance dictate best practice.
Posted 18 June 2007 - 05:51 PM
Do not provide a sitemap or table of contents unless the site cannot be understood or navigated without it.
Posted 18 June 2007 - 08:34 PM
Posted 18 June 2007 - 08:39 PM
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:16 PM
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:21 PM
Posted 19 June 2007 - 05:34 AM
Posted 19 June 2007 - 09:43 AM
Posted 22 June 2007 - 10:02 AM
Posted 22 June 2007 - 11:40 AM
Posted 22 June 2007 - 01:08 PM
Isn't the idea to NOT build sites to degrade, but to build them up? i.e. rather than build a site that doesn't work without JS, and hhacking on <noiscript> functionality, build something that works WITHOUT JS, and add in the JS at runtime for better browsers.
Posted 22 June 2007 - 01:15 PM
Isn't the idea to NOT build sites to degrade, but to build them up?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users