Wordtracker V's Keyword Discovery
Posted 22 January 2008 - 06:08 PM
If I was building a comprehensive site or a new area on the site with many pages for a single KW, then I would get the paid subscription.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:37 AM
Timely question to ask as my WT subscription expired and I have been looking at KWD recently... I kinda hear KWD is a lot better but more expensive?
If anyone has an opinion on KWD and its usefulness I would love to know.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:17 PM
EGOL so am I right in assuming that if you were going to pay it would be for KD?
kulpreet_singh thanks for your feedback.
I might give KD a go for a month or two and then compare. From my understanding they have better data for regional searches, such as Australia, which would benefit me.
If anyone else has any feedback we'd love to hear it.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:42 PM
I find it helps to take one and stick to it. The amount of time one can waist going between tools is... well.. substantial
For me the key is to get a feel for the data. This does require some back-and-forth though. Do a couple of researches on 2-4 services, both free and paid. See where they agree and where not.
I also like compete.com a lot although it's not a true KW service.
Finally, the data you can get via free tools is quite solid too.
Posted 31 January 2008 - 08:24 AM
What is the opinion about Google External Keyword Tool ?
I found one problem with Wordtracker that I does not gives exact number of searches but it gives count but when starting any project I want to know estimate number of visitors which can be arrived at the site If I got 1st position in search results.
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:14 AM
The results and options are just better to me in keyword discovery and I didn't like the recent changes to wordtracker with how they display their results.
Posted 12 February 2008 - 05:49 AM
Edited by wyliet, 12 February 2008 - 05:50 AM.
Posted 12 February 2008 - 08:07 AM
From the looks of it, KWD offers similar tools to WT, but from different data sources.
What do you find useful in WordZe, Ruud? It doesn't seem to me they offer much beyond keyword research, really. The SERP scraping and link tracking that they have (and call it a 'patent pending technology) doesn't look that good to me.
Edited by A.N.Onym, 12 February 2008 - 08:10 AM.
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:40 AM
I used to use the free version of WT, never went for a paid one.
KWD - never tried it even.
But WordZe does actually do everything I need, plus it handles keywords in languages other than English just fine.
Google External keyword tool - yea it's ok whenever it does not go down or has glitches, only trouble I have with it is the lack of actual figures. So whenever I need a quick look at something I will most likely go to Google external keyword tool. Whenever I need detailed data and long keyword lists I use WordZe.
Posted 13 February 2008 - 04:56 AM
I did use WT paid version for a while and also used KWD free, so I am kinda choosing what to pay for next, besides WT.
Posted 15 February 2008 - 04:41 PM
As far as WordZe, I think that they have an excellent interface and the making of some very useful tools. Unfortunately, by comparing WordZe data to what I know is real data (based on PPC campaigns), they are very inaccurate. I don't know where they are pulling their data from, but it doesn't match up with what I see in Google, Yahoo or MS. Not even close.
My suggestion to anyone looking for a professional keyword tool is to do a one month subscription with each WT and KD (perform beginning to end keyword research and expansion with each) and decide which you prefer.
Edited by chris1, 15 February 2008 - 04:42 PM.
Posted 15 February 2008 - 05:07 PM
KD only allows you to search one phrase at a time, but is more accurate (imho). I use it to verify the top phrases I get from WT results, or if I only need to check a couple phrases.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users