Or, are you a damn-the-list-and-fire-off-the-content person? Perfection can lead to paralysis.
Possible target areas:
- If there is a blog, have a few blog posts in the can - enough to give wiggle room if not everything goes according to plan
- Enough content to make the site feel like it has depth
- Check content for quality - is it spellchecked? Clear? Accurate? Does it need inline links to other pages?
- Work out the obvious bugs - the broken bits like coding errors and broken links
- Message clarity - is it obvious what the site is supposed to be about?
- Review SEO specifics - is there an xml site map, do pages have unique titles?
- Make any structural parent/child/navigation tweaks
- Review branding, at the body language level, more than just putting up a logo and a few pages of text. What should the site's interactive personality feel like, to the user?
- Professional-level window-dressing - do you have a favicon? Logo? If it's a WordPress-run community site, have you replaced the WordPress's login logo and link with your own?
- Register any user names that are the same as the domain name in Twitter, FaceBook, gmail, etc.
- Have you created a custom 404 page with handy links?
- Does the site print well?
- Check for cross-browser display, in both standard and small screens
- Is navigation intuitive? Once on the site, can you tell where you are in relation to other content?
- Re-test any forms
- Check load time
- Install analytics and a feed reader
Unsure of *how* to test and check some of these things? Look around for tools and guidelines, get outside help or borrow from how the experts do it. For instance, Automattic (the WordPress company) makes use of screenshots of graphic mock-ups troubleshoot usability before any coding is done.
Used to coding in a text editor and adding graphic touches later? Check in with someone who does the opposite (starts with graphics) to see if that difference in ways of seeing reveals unnoticed problems or potentials.
Does anyone have tips to share about how fixes done after the fact could have been caught before launch?






