Edited by sansonj72, 15 February 2012 - 01:12 AM.
#1
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:12 AM
#2
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:53 AM
For some keyword searches my bounce rate is very low, for other sources much higher. Break it down further then if it is all the "homes" and "houses" searches that are high BR then there may be a problem, if these are low, then maybe not!
#3
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:40 AM
Another two complimentary points to check are:
* given the search query or anchor/surrounding text of referer, page title/description as shown in search results is the page providing an answer, i.e. visitor gets information looked for, so visitor has no need to stay longer, investigate further?
* if above is no, is there an onpage link to such an answer/information?
---where on page, i.e. above or below the fold?
---how obvious is the surrounding and anchor text in grabbing attention directing the visitor?
Note: if there is both no ready answer and no link to satisfy the visitor then you might well consider adding it.
#4
Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:55 PM
Visits
309
% of Site Total: 58.19%
Pages/Visit
1.55
Site Avg: 1.70 (-8.83%)
Avg. Time on Site
00:01:11
Site Avg: 00:01:43 (-30.67%)
% New Visits
74.76%
Site Avg: 69.68% (7.29%)
Bounce Rate
76.70%
Site Avg: 73.07% (4.97%)
None 1.
google 243 1.56 00:01:14 71.19% 76.54% 2.
bing 33 1.61 00:01:16 81.82% 81.82% 3.
yahoo 16 1.38 00:00:36 100.00% 81.25% 4.
aol 5 1.00 00:00:00 80.00% 100.00% 5.
search 5 1.40 00:00:25 100.00% 60.00% 6.
ask 3 1.67 00:00:28 100.00% 33.33% 7.
comcast 3 1.33 00:01:39 66.67% 66.67% 8.
avg 1 2.00 00:05:54 100.00% 0.00%
#5
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:38 PM
Do you have one page in particular that is bouncing more than others?
Generally speaking, bounce rates are misleading ... your analytics tracking cannot capture the "last event" in the user's click-stream, so even a 100% bounce rate might fail to reflect user engagement with the site (they could be clicking on social media icons, for example -- I don't believe analytics tracks that kind of activity but I would be interested to learn how it does if it can).
#6
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:43 PM
Visits
25
% of Site Total: 4.71%
Pages/Visit
1.12
Site Avg: 1.70 (-33.99%)
Avg. Time on Site
00:00:05
Site Avg: 00:01:43 (-94.78%)
% New Visits
80.00%
Site Avg: 69.68% (14.81%)
Bounce Rate
88.00%
Site Avg: 73.07% (20.43%)
None 1.
iPad 22 1.14 00:00:06 77.27% 86.36% 2.
Android 2 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 3.
iPhone 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00%
100.00%
#7
Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:12 PM
#8
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:15 PM
#9
Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:54 AM
#10
Posted 16 February 2012 - 04:11 AM
You need to look as specifically as possible, so pick one individual page, then look at the keywords used to access that page, and then see which of those has the highest bounce - that will give you an idea of what they were looking for they didn't find. Sometimes you need to be even more specific than that, eg the mobiles, browser type, refering site, refering page as there might be something that's unique to those visitors eg a code problem.
#11
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:38 AM
horrid design.
no indication from domain name or graphic identity what the website is about
having wordpress idents lowers the tone further (as it is WP just swap out with another template, buy one from themeforest.com)
advertising items break the design frame.
Tidy those elements up and your bounce rate will come down.
#12
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:41 PM
Let me be brutal:
horrid design.
no indication from domain name or graphic identity what the website is about
having wordpress idents lowers the tone further (as it is WP just swap out with another template, buy one from themeforest.com)
advertising items break the design frame.
Tidy those elements up and your bounce rate will come down.
#13
Posted 19 February 2012 - 02:47 PM
#14
Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:00 PM
Edited by sansonj72, 19 February 2012 - 05:01 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






