Is there a reason from the SEO perspective to block a search engine from following a link to one's company Facebook page and their shopping cart?
Reasons To Use Robots.txt To Block Facebook And Shopping Cart
Started by cre8pc, Nov 21 2012 01:00 PM
3 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 21 November 2012 - 02:29 PM
No idea about carts, but my Facebook Page ranks for my brand which helps to keep the spammers and trademark thieves out the way. I assume it would not rank so well if I did not link to it / nofollowed my links.
I did nofollow FB and Twitter once, but then decided against it. The reasons for nofollow, according to Google at least are for paid links or links to neighbourhoods / websites that you do not trust. My SM pages do not fall under either of those so I let the link juice flow.
In fact, on the first page of Google for my domain / brand there is:
me
twitter
me
google+
me
facebook
pinterest
That, I think, is good.
I did nofollow FB and Twitter once, but then decided against it. The reasons for nofollow, according to Google at least are for paid links or links to neighbourhoods / websites that you do not trust. My SM pages do not fall under either of those so I let the link juice flow.
In fact, on the first page of Google for my domain / brand there is:
me
me
google+
me
That, I think, is good.
#4
Posted 21 November 2012 - 10:14 PM
I don't know about Facebook by as for the cart, but some time back I read a blog post by Matt Cutts who suggested that if the extra material ie; cart, did not add to the visitor experience that maybe it could be tagged. Trouble is they never say for sure, and whether the cart adds to the visitor experience is ambiguous at best.
Maybe I will check out some of my page one competitors and see if some of their cart pages are indexed.
Maybe I will check out some of my page one competitors and see if some of their cart pages are indexed.
Reply to this topic

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






