This is a fun question.
You know how every year some of the popular SEO websites post their big SEO ranking factors reports? They get the data presented in these reports by sending a checkbox questionnaire out to a bunch of people who post in SEO forums and then post aggregate results.
A lot of time and effort goes into these reports but really, they are pure rubbish.
If those same reports included people's names and revealed their individual inputs then I would call them awesome!
Why is one of these rubbish and the other awesome! ?
Because there are enough drunks singing in that choir to drown out the people who know what they are takin' about.
However, if I could read the input from people like iamlost, Donna and MarieHaynes, then I would think those reports are worth reading. But you take the input from those brilliant minds and average or mingle it with a bunch of other people and it isn't anything you can bet on.
Edited by EGOL, 19 May 2015 - 11:32 PM.