Jump to content

Cre8asiteforums

Web Site Design, Usability, SEO & Marketing Discussion and Support

earlpearl

Acquisition, Channels, Overviews: Ga Replaces Good Kw Info With Crappy Bs

Recommended Posts

Google recently replaced its GA dashboard with a variety of new terms and charts. Ohhhhhhhhhh boy. More crummy info from GA replacing what is vital and important.

 

We now have channels and acquisitions and overviews and behaviors. We don't have keyword data.

 

I like data and I like good data. I liked how Rand worded a hypothetical conversation between an seo and client with the client suggesting spending time and money on social media while the seo urged him to continue to work on seo even with keyword data being hidden.

 

For our local smb sites search, intent, and keywords go hand in hand that lead to sales. Some fairly big social media hits go with tons of traffic and bubkis in revenues.

 

It is not without some clever perspectives that google is filling GA with more and more sizzle and less and less steak.

 

my $0.02 rant for the day!!!! :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, can you not some kind of usefulness out of webmaster tools, I see things there like top searches and top pages. Click a page and see what KW got there. Click on top KW and see landing page + position.

 

I know it's not like having it in the URL but it's something. It's long and the data is not really yours to play with. The top pages is a bit lame. Can't search/filter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had to do a search today to figure out that to see what phrases brought in traffic, i had to now go through Acquisitions. Stupid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Google recently replaced its GA dashboard with a variety of new terms

and charts. Ohhhhhhhhhh boy. More crummy info from GA replacing what

is vital and important.

 

That's what happens when you have PhDs running things. :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what happens when you have PhDs running things. :)

I don't think its that at all. Once again I'll reference local with regard to these changes: loss of keywords and now all this fancy shmancy worthless additional google bs.

 

Ever since google generated a "dashboard" for local businesses that claim a listing...they have generated a dashboard full of miserable misleading, worthless half cocked data.

 

Among the data are 10 keywords that generated "maps" impressions plus possible actions (actions equaled a visit to the site, the places page info or a request for directions.

 

only 10 keywords. The keyword data truncates out all geo descriptive information. You don't know the city or any other vital keyword data. You don't know if the city name (if its part of the keyword, comes before or after the service/product. You don't know if these "maps" impressions came from the first page of google or google maps or if a search phrase generated your business on a map...but you are buried on page 4,5,6 or 10 of G maps.

 

One fascinating thing about this "impression" info is you have no idea how big a geography the "local dashboard" covers.

 

In sum its been long term purposeful lousy data.

 

Google knows exactly which data is valuable...and it chooses to give out crummy data. Its not an accident. Its deliberate.

 

Now they are dancing with the same garbage in G Analytics.

 

Feed the serfs and peons gruel (and don't give them seconds). One thing google realizes is it generate anything it wants with regard to webmasters and there will be no consequences.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feed the serfs and peons gruel (and don't give them seconds). One thing google realizes is it generate anything it wants with regard to webmasters and there will be no consequences.

 

One thing that has totally amazed and astounded me since I came to SEO space is the impunity with which g##### does it and the willingness of the players -- website owners and SEO's in this case -- to let to happen.

 

If they were doing this to CPA's or Attornies, we would inflict some serious pain for g##### in exchange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should put earlpearl in charge of "tag design" for the forum. Not sure they'd add a lot for SEO but the entertainment value would be very high! :)



Oh, and btw, I agree, LOL! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they were doing this to CPA's or Attornies, we would inflict some serious pain for g##### in exchange.

I would agree except, just like Goldman Sachs, everything they do is legal; their game, their data, their rules. There is no contract 'tween them and us. What they do sucks but......

 

Maybe, like in the EU, we can complain and get them, via our elected officials, :lol: to not show our data as if it were theirs. eg Word definitions from Miriam-Webster, our hot linked images, etc

 

Maybe we should start a support Bing/Yahoo campaign.

 

Another idea from the EU thing: Force all SEs to not show their properties on top of the organic. It's deceitful. They know the top 3 is what people click because they think they are the most relative "answers" except they are paid results that are purposefully coloured to be almost impossible to distinguish from organic. That smells like false advertising.

Edited by bobbb
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×