Jump to content

Cre8asiteforums

Discussing Web Design & Marketing Since 1998

  • Announcements

    • cre8pc

      Thank you! Cre8asiteforums 1998 - 2018   01/18/2018

      Internet Marketing Ninjas released many of the online forums they had acquired, such as WebmasterWorld, SEOChat, several DevShed properties and these forums back to their founders. You will notice a new user interface for Cre8asiteforums, the software was upgraded, and it was moved to a new server. Thank you for your support as we turn 20 years old.  
Sign in to follow this  
glyn

Fighting With Index,no Index And Canonicals

Recommended Posts

If I have a page that is declared in the header: INDEX, FOLLOW

 

The page will be indexed and the links will be followed. Actually it's almost redundant this tag on a page you want indexed, just I am at the mercy of a 3rd party plugin that won't remove it. So.

 

Then further down the page there is a canonical URL that says, actually SE SPIDER you should go an index this other page because the one you are on only has a few things which are different from the one you are crawling, so best index that one.

 

The fact that the index,follow is in the header isn't going to confuse anyone is it? I am currently reviewing some SEO on a website and want to make sure I am drawing the right conclusions even if they defy logic.

 

Thanks

 

Glyn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just read these articles and come to the conclusion there is no confusion. They talk about link and ranking signals and which is the preferred to show in the SERPs. I am not an expert except I know how to read. I stuck with Google articles and did not read any articles which were not and thus, in my eyes, opinions of others.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139066

This article describes how you can use canonical URLs to improve link and ranking signals for content available through multiple URL structures or via syndication.
In the world of content management and online shopping systems, it's common for the same content to be accessed through multiple URLs.

This part in the article is confusing.

Mark up the canonical page and any other variants with a rel="canonical" link element.


https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html

https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×